Apologetics

,

Tucker Carlson Is Wrong About the Third Temple

,
Tucker Carlson Is Wrong About the Third Temple

In a recent video, Tucker Carlson argued that a future physical temple in Jerusalem would amount to a denial of Christ, claiming that the Bible teaches Jesus replaced the temple entirely. He further claims that anyone who would like to see a future temple is apostate and has missed the whole point of Christianity. But does Scripture actually support these claims? In this video, we take a careful look at what Jesus and the apostles believed about the Jerusalem temple to see whether Tucker’s argument holds up biblically. What did Jesus actually teach about the temple? And how did the apostles treat it after the Messiah's resurrection and ascension?

,

R. L. Solberg's Flawed Approach to Scripture

,
R. L. Solberg's Flawed Approach to Scripture

In this video, we look at R. L. Solberg’s approach to Scripture by focusing on his mishandling of Matthew 5:17–20. Rather than considering the immediate context, Solberg ignores it completely and appeals to other, unrelated texts to argue that Jesus could not have meant what he said in this passage. This eisegetical approach raises serious doubts about his reliability as a biblical interpreter.

,

Candace Owens is Wrong About Christians and the Sabbath

,
Candace Owens is Wrong About Christians and the Sabbath

Candace Owens rejects the premise of Charlie Kirk’s new book on honoring the Sabbath, saying, “I’m not going to do that because I’m Christian.” But are Sabbath observance and following Christ really mutually exclusive? According to the Bible, they are not.

,

Nick Fuentes is Wrong About the Law of Moses, Israel, and the New Testament

,
Nick Fuentes is Wrong About the Law of Moses, Israel, and the New Testament

Nick Fuentes claims that the New Testament has replaced the Hebrew Scriptures ("Old Testament"), that Jesus has replaced the Law of Moses, and that Christians have replaced Israel. This video explains why he is wrong.

Timothy Alberino is Wrong about the Son of Man in the Book of Enoch

Timothy Alberino is Wrong about the Son of Man in the Book of Enoch

Timothy Alberino claims that the “Son of Man” passages in the Book of Enoch are prophecies about Jesus and takes this as proof that the Book of Enoch is divinely inspired. However, there is a major problem with that idea: the Book of Enoch explicitly identifies Enoch himself—not Jesus—as the Son of Man, which directly contradicts the New Testament.

,

It is Not "Satanic" to Agree with the Apostolic Decree

,
It is Not "Satanic" to Agree with the Apostolic Decree

A popular account on X (formerly Twitter) recently labeled me a “Judaizer” for agreeing with the Apostolic Decree in Acts 15:20. Other folks then piled on, calling me “Satanic,” a “heretic,” and all sorts of other names. In this video, I’ll explain why it should not be controversial to believe that the four commandments of the Apostolic Decree are still relevant. As I’ll demonstrate, these four commandments are consistently affirmed throughout the New Testament and early Christian writings.

,

Paul Does Not Condemn the Biblical Calendar in Galatians 4:10 | A Response to Steven Anderson

,
Paul Does Not Condemn the Biblical Calendar in Galatians 4:10 | A Response to Steven Anderson

In Galatians 4:8–11, Paul rebukes the Galatians for observing “days and months and seasons and years.” What exactly does Paul mean by this phrase? The standard antinomian view, represented by Pastor Steven Anderson, is that this is a reference to the biblical calendar outlined in the Law of Moses. Thus, Paul is condemning the observance of the Sabbath and biblical festivals, or so the argument goes. But is that really what this passage teaches? In this video, we take a closer look at the context and historical background of Galatians 4:10. In contrast to Pastor Anderson, I contend that Paul is not chastising the Galatians for observing the biblical calendar, but for something entirely different.

Ian Carroll is Wrong about the Scofield Bible

Ian Carroll is Wrong about the Scofield Bible

Ian Carroll recently claimed that the Rothschild family commissioned Cyrus Scofield to create a new, pro-Jewish version of the Bible—the “Scofield Bible”—to dupe evangelicals into supporting Israel and the Jewish people. The problem, however, is that Carroll’s theory has zero evidence and is purely a product of his own fevered imagination, as I explain.

,

A Change in the Law (Hebrews 7:12)

,
A Change in the Law (Hebrews 7:12)

In Hebrews 7:12, the author announces, “For when there is a change in the priesthood, there is necessarily a change in the law as well.” Many have taken this to mean that the Levitical priesthood and the entire Law of Moses has been overturned. But is that really what the author of Hebrews is saying? Actually, there are some major problems with this interpretation.

,

James Understood the Gospel. Matt McMillen Does Not.

,
James Understood the Gospel. Matt McMillen Does Not.

A Christian TikTok/Instagram influencer named Matt McMillen claims that James did not fully appreciate the Messiah’s work on the cross and did not understand the gospel. He bases this claim on James’s affirmation of the ongoing validity of the Law of Moses, which McMillen views as conflicting with the Gospel. In this video, I interact with McMillen's objections.

,

Keep Torah Better Than the Scribes and Pharisees (Matthew 5:20)

,
Keep Torah Better Than the Scribes and Pharisees (Matthew 5:20)

Jesus taught that the Law of Moses is not abolished (Matthew 5:17), that it will remain in force for as long as heaven and earth endure (Matthew 5:18), and that his followers must obey and teach it (Matthew 5:19). Now, in Matthew 5:20, he demands that his followers surpass the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees. But what does it mean to surpass their righteousness? In this video, we will explore this question in detail.

,

I Did NOT Mischaracterize Dr. Averbeck's Views on the Law of Moses

,
I Did NOT Mischaracterize Dr. Averbeck's Views on the Law of Moses

Andrew Schumacher has accused me of mischaracterizing Dr. Richard Averbeck’s position on the Law of Moses during my interview with him. So, I decided to show some clips from the interview, which debunk Andrew's accusation. Furthermore, I reached out to Dr. Averbeck directly to ask him if he thought that I misrepresented him. In this video, I’ll show you what Dr. Averbeck said.

Sign up to my newsletter:

Enter your email below to get notified when I publish new articles and videos.

Connect with me online: